(
All reproduced from Mumbai Mirror August
31, 2008 pages 18 )
Advani for fast
track courts to try politicians
NEW DELHI:
Expressing
concern at "growing
corruption in politics" in
the wake of the cashfor-votes
scam, senior BJP leader L K
Advani on Saturday suggested that
fast-track courts could be
established to try corruption
cases against politicians and
civil servants.
"The BJP is
willing to consider any effective
mechanism for fast-track disposal of
cases involving major economic offences
and corruption cases against politicians
and civil servants," Advani said at
a conference on 'Governance and
Politics', organised by the Legal and
Legislative Cell of BJP. PTI
.
.....Pleease
Copy and mail to your
friends....
Subject:
Let us all force L K Advani
issue a Pre-Poll Assurance
... He meant it.
Dear
friend,
Please
read how our judiciary blocks
action against corrupt MPS,
MLAs.
Politicians
declare, "We desire
action against criminal MPs
& MLAs" ... but do
they really mean what they
say?
We thought it was
necessary, to offer MLAs & MPs an added advantage
over the general population ... Fast track process
thru the courts ... But the Judges
disagreed in February 2008... We need help to take it
to Supreme Court NOW. Trust Mr L K Advani
can push it during election time, to garner votes for
his party, still the country will benefit.
_____Unusual dismissal
order_____
Date 20th February 2008
1. There is an
usual prayer in this Public Interest Litigation that
all judicial authorities in the state of Maharashtra
should be directed to take up criminal cases on
priority basis where the accused persons are
legislators or former legislators pr public Servants
or former public servants. we are afraid that we
cannot create such a classification. Already we
understand that administratively judicial officers
have been given directions as to which cases should
be taken on priority and which cases should not be
taken on priority.
2. The
public Interest Litigation is misconceived and is
accordingly, dismissed.
(Justice Bilal Nazki, )
(Justice S. A. Bobde )
______We
Need to approach the Supreme Court______
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
1. The State of Maharashtra .Respondents
At the instance of
Addl. Chief Secretary, Home Department,
Government of Maharashtra, Mantralaya,
Mumbai;
2. The President of India
New Delhi
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION
OF INDIA
IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLES 14, 19 & 21 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
To,
The Honourable the Chief Justice and
other Puisne Judges of this Honble
High Court of Judicature at Bombay.
Humble Petition of the Petitioner abovenamed :
Most Respectfully Sheweth :
(1) The Petitioner is most humbly praying for
appropriate Writs including that of Mandamus and / or
directions as this Honourable Court may deem fit, to
the Respondent Nos. 1 to 2 to assist the courts to
fast track all criminal cases wherein legislators and
public servants, both serving and retired, are the
accused persons.
(2) The Petitioner is an elder citizen of India
residing alongwith his family at the address stated
in the title clause. The Petitioner is an educated
person with the qualifications of a Mechanical
Engineer and has successfully lead his life as a
businessman with clean record. He has all throughout
been enjoying a very good reputation and respect in
the society. The Petitioner is a public spirit person
concerned for the well being of the society and hence
has come before this Honourable Court with the
present Petition. He is also the managing trustee of
People for Legal and Emotional Assistance to
the Deserving (PLEAD) Regd No E-24397 (BOM).
(3) The objective of PLEAD is to bring together all
retired highly educated persons such as Engineers,
Doctors, Lawyers, Military personnel, Teachers,
Journalists, Judges, Police officers and other
literate citizens to unite under one forum and form
citizen groups in each police station area to bring
about changes in all matters of importance to the
public and the nation through legal and democratic
means. Contents of leaflet circulated are attached as
EXHIBIT A
(4) In the short time of 4 weeks, over 50 individuals
have joined PLEAD, amongst them are Shri Umesh
Saksena, retired Executive Director of LIC of India,
Shri Lal Chand Soni Retired Executive Vice President
Carona Ltd., Shri Nanik Bhutani, Principal NKM
College, Bandra, Shri S K Jain leading Advocate of
Mumbai High Court, Rotarian Saifudin Alibhai
Saria,(social activist), Shri S D Velegar retired
Technocrat. Attached are their forms as EXHIBIT B
COLLY. In the coming months thousands across Mumbai
are expected to join in.
(5) All the members are above 60 years of age and
have a burning desire, to see changes in the country,
before it is time to depart from this world.
(6) The Respondents are as described in the title
clause and need no further introduction.
(7) In brief the facts in background are as follows
:-
A. There are numerous types of citizens in the
country, some are illiterate others are educated,
B. Others are those that are not only educated but
also entrusted with deciding what laws all the
citizens are to follow, these are civic members,
legislative assembly member and members of
parliament.
C. There are others entrusted with the upkeep of the
law, who ensure that the laws formulated by the above
are strictly followed, eg the police force.
D. Both the above categories of people are very
influential, with enormous clout in the law and order
machinery of the state.
E. Very often it is noted that those who create the
laws and those who are entrusted with the job of
ensuring that the laws are followed, themselves break
the laws ... which is a matter of serious concern to
the country at large.
F. And when in rare instance the case comes to the
court, these very influential people, ensure that the
case goes on and on and on for 20 years or 30 years
or more it takes for the case to be finally decided,
after going through the various courts, such as
Sessions, High Court and the Supreme Court ... The
result is that this influential accused becomes very
old and in most cases dies of old age after which the
case is closed. Very often the witnesses and panchas
die, before the verdict at the trial court.
G. The resultant delay and the fact that the
influential accused never received any punishment
sends a loud message to all who are in this position,
that no matter what they do, whether it is taking a
bribe, or instigating riots or committing Murder or
commit any other crime, they will eventually be able
to ensure the case goes on and on and escape
punishment.
H. There is an urgent need, for the Judicial
Authorities to formulate a rule whereby, whenever an
accused is the person either responsible for creating
laws or responsible for the upkeep of the law, after
the case filed, the verdict must be decided within a
12 month period by the trial court. And thereafter
all appeals must be disposed off within the next 12
months, by the higher courts.
I. This will send a clear message to all those in
power that the they will not be able to escape
punishment for crimes committed but may have to spend
many years in jail and NOT have the luxury of dying
of old age and escape punishment.
J. It is observed, that influential people often
become more corrupt towards the fag end of their
careers as they believe that it is the last few
years, in a powerful position, and the chance of
collecting more money will never come again.
G R O U N D S F O R P E T I T I O N
I. Increasingly it is observed that individuals who
should set an example to their juniors are setting a
bad example.
II. Corruption and other crimes by influential
persons is increasing by leaps and bounds and needs
to be checked, by punishing the influential promptly.
III. Public servants form a distinct class and a
different treatment of a distinct class is
permissible. As they get preferential treatment
everywhere, they should be given preferential
treatment in courts too, by expediting their trial.
P R A Y E R S
1. That the Rule may be issued;
2. That the Respondents be directed by a writ of
mandamus or any other similar direction issued under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the
public interest to fast track/expedite the
investigations and prosecution of all such accused
persons who are or were legislators or public
servants as defined under the Indian Penal Code,
1860.
3. That this Honble Court be pleased to direct
all judicial authorities in the State of Maharashtra
to fast track/expedite the trial and disposal of all
criminal cases wherein the accused persons are or
were legislators or public servants as defined under
the Indian Penal Code, 1860 so as to ensure that all
such cases are decided preferably within a period of
12 months by the trial court from the date of
registration of FIR/cognizance of private complaint
and thereafter all appeals are decided in the next 12
months.
4. That this Honble Court in its extraordinary
jurisdiction conferred by the Constitution of India
be pleased to devise methods and case tracking and
disposal systems whereby criminal cases involving
legislators and public servants as accused persons
are fast tracked/expedited so that the citizens of
this country are re-assured that however high and
mighty a criminal may be, the law will deal with
him/her swiftly and effectively.
5. For any other and further relief as deemed fit in
view of the important issue of public interest raised
in this Writ Petition.
For this act of kindness and justice the Petitioner
shall ever pray.
Mumbai : / /2008
( for Petitioner)
A F F I R M A T I O N
I Indur K. Chhugani, adult, Indian inhabitant,
resident of Mumbai, the Petitioner abovenamed, do
hereby solemnly affirm and state that I have read the
contents of the foregoing paragraphs and whatever
stated therein is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief.