Points to Ponder: Khar PS Case 103/05
Had the Investigation been impartial, by now the Khar Police should have arrested Bank Managers, for filing a false complaint and filing false affidavits, but Punjab NationalBank and Bharat Overseas Bank are like cash machines. How much must be extracted out of them, can only be guessed. My guess is not less than Rs 5 lakhs to 10 lakhs. And EOW officer must have received a separate sum for NOT ivestigating how or why they advanced Rs 7 crores against a 398 sq ft flat.WHY & What API Walzade did not investigate before arresting me. The New officer Inspector Dhatrak is more interested in protecting his collegue API Walzade, who is now under investigation. How long...I will see.
1 Police should have made an effort , to get a printout of all calls made and received on my mobile 98201 71571, to verify whether I was telling the truth, instead I am struggling to get a printout from ORANGE. They are refusing to give the printout and say "Only if Police ask, will we give it". And the police is not interested in proving my innocence. They are trying to prove the Bank officers innocent, that's a impossible task, even if all the Rogues in Mumbai Police use their collective powers, they will not succeed.
2. What I had spoken to the Police officer (98211 40010) on phone at Palton Road Police Station, when Mr Datta had gone to register a NC against me, on 24th Feb.05. I had told the officer.
" Mr. Datta is a mad man, he wants a bribe of Rs 5 lacs, when my bid for the flat is the highest. Ask him, if he wants 1 lakh i will give it to him, thru you ". Police officers do not get such replies often.3. I had seen opening page of BOBL Police complaint. First line stated "Reserve price of Rs 65 lakhs". Tender documents show reserve price as Rs 60 Lakhs. Are they trying to justify asking for Rs 5 lacs cash.
4. Why did he not question Bank managers, if they had opened flats on 12th Feb 05. I am certain they could not have denied it. Automatically charge of breaking seal would have had to be dropped, against me, with it would have gone the other charges too.
5. Police were in a hurry to report to The Judge next day, 29th March 05, that they had arrested Mr. Chhugani. They were confident, of altering facts later, to justify their illegal action.
6. The IO Walzade and PSI Inamdar had supreme confidence (misplaced) that they will be in a position to destroy the Visitors register, which provided proof of Bank officers opening Flats on 12th Feb 05 . (What price Banks must have paid, I can only imagine). They were checkmated by my lawyer, who on 7th April 05 moved a misc Application before MPID court, requesting the Judge to take possession of the visitors register. The judge has taken possession of the register.
7. After the Court custody of the register, the Banks had no alternative but to accept, the fact of their opening the flats on 12th Feb.05. A fact earlier denied by them and ignored by Walzade and Inamdar. WHO WERE VERY WELL AWARE OF THE FACTS.
8. PNB & BOBL have lied to the courts that " Chhugani never inspected the flats, prior to filling up tender documents". However 4 0fficers of the 2 Banks, if questioned, will come out with the truth, that the Banks are filing false affidavits. And also confirm there exists a crucial form, filled by potential buyers, which is being withheld from the court, because it carries my name and signature.
9. Chief Manager of Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. Mr. Mihir Datta has made a false statement/affidavit in MPID court stating "I do not know Mr.Chhugani". He knows me since end June 04. He has come to my house atleast 8 times, with his Sr and Jr officials. Taken help from me at every stage. Taken me out for lunch at least 6 times and has has had the Bank Car drop me home from Fountain to Khar at least 3 times. On 3 other occassions, his car has dropped me while taking Sr officials, (Who come from Chennai) towards the Airport.
10. The Banks have again lied, in an affidavit, that Chhugani has broken the seal of The Chief Presidency Magistrate. HOW CAN THAT BE. The Banks received possession on 12/10/04 with the help of the Registrar of the court. They got flats valued on 23/10/05, on which date they must have opened the flats, after which date Magistrates seal cannot be there.
11. Thereafter MPID court seal was SUPPOSEDLY put on 8th February 05. Banks opened flats on 12/02/05, So MPID Court seal cannot be there after 12/02/05. I received possession from Chief Manager Of BOBL Mr. Mihir Datta on 27th February 05, in presence of 6 witnesses. Even if he denies he gave possession. How can I be accused breaking any court seal. ... (All The Above was posted in May 2005.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 30/01/2006 the MPID court discharged me form the accusation of "Having broken the court seal" ..... However the Rogue Police Officers of Khar, still filed a chargesheet against me, my wife and son at the Bandra Magistrates Court on 03/05/ 2006 .... Inspite of.:
A... The MPID Court (sessions court) had ruled, that there was no order to seal the flat, there was no evidence that the flat had been sealed and observed that the Bank Managers had concealed a lot of Information ... I have moved 2 applications for perjury and tampering of court records against Bank Managers and police officer Inamdar of EOW at the MPID court ... pending,
B... In October 2005, I had filed a writ petition in Bombay High Court, asking for quashing of case at khar, for action against Bank managers plus 3 police officers for Perjury and wrongful arrest and claimed Rs 10 lacs from Maharashtra Government for wrongful arrest ... On 15/02/2006, the high Court had admitted my writ and as interim relief, stayed all proceedings of the case at Khar Police station, till final hearing
....However in contempt of this HC order, Khar Police filed chargesheet on 03/05/2006 ... Contempt of Court proceeding have been initiated against Khar Police in HC (because now I will be required to defend myself at Bandra Magistrates court for 10s of years)..... Pending.