The
traffic police has favoured a advertisement
company, that earns Rs 9 crores EVERY MONTH
since 2001... Our estimate is, that a minimum
Rs 3 crores is paid under the table EVERY
MONTH to the police, in return)
(Reproduced
below from the Mumbai Mirror 8th March 2008, pg 11)
HC targets
traffic police chowkies Judge
Nazki observes that advertisements distract drivers
and put their lives at risk
MUMBAI MIRROR BUREAU
Sponsored police chowkies have come under the High
Court scanner once more. After police chowkies, the
Bombay High Court (HC) has pulled up the traffic
police for accepting sponsorships to build traffic
chowkies. Police, and to a certain extent other
government departments should not accept private
sponsorship to meet their infrastructure needs,
observed a division bench of Justices Bilal Nazki and
Sharad Bobade, on Friday.
The court then asked the police
to clear their stand on traffic booths across the
city which are allegedly owned by private advertising
companies, in two weeks time. According to a petition
filed by social activist I K Chhugani, 74 traffic
booths are sponsored by Everest Media.
The company earns huge revenues
by selling advertising space on these booths. When
chief public prosecutor Satish Borulkar informed the
court that these chowkies were not owned by
police,Justice Nazki observed, Whatever you
say, if you have taken money for infrastructure then
it amounts to misconduct. You are
distracting drivers and putting their lives at risk
by putting advertisement hoardings on the traffic
booths. Dont you think it is necessary to apply
ones mind in public interest?asked the
court.
P.L.E.A.D.needs funds, to
contribute ...Click here
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Reproduced
below from the Times of India 8th March 2008, pg 9)
Sponsored
chowkies: HC slams police
Mumbai: The high court on Friday came down heavily on
the city police for accepting private sponsorships to
set up chowkies and traffic booths.
Hearing a PIL filed by a Khar
resident on private individuals, mainly builders,
funding the chowkies, a division bench of Justices
Bilal Nazki and Sharad Bobde asked the Mumbai police
to clear their stand in two weeks on traffic booths
owned by a private advertising company.
Petitioner I K Chhugani told
the court that 74 traffic booths had been set up
across the city by a private firm, which was earning
a huge revenue by selling advertising space at the
booths.
Public prosecutor Satish
Borulkar argued that the booths were not owned by the
police department and that a share of the revenue
actually went to the BMC, which had given permission
for the same.
If you have accepted
private investment for infrastructure, it is
misconduct, said the judges, wanting to know if
the government would allow hoardings at Mantralaya.
The bench also said it was an
issue that affected peoples faith in the
police. When you have advertisement on booths,
the common man can think that (the) police are at the
beck and call of somebody.
Earlier, the police had assured
the court that they would demolish all unauthorised
chowkiesmany of which had been built with
private fundsin six months. TNN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Reproduced
below from the Times of India 1st March 2008, pg 20)
Take
demolition order seriously: HC
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
Mumbai: The Bombay high court on Friday
warned the state that it would order demolition of
all 269 illegal police chowkies within seven days if
the police failed to take its previous order to pull
down the structures seriously.
When
the state, through its lawyer, said it has demolished
two chowkies in five weeks since the order, a
division bench of justices Bilal Nazki and Sharad
Bobde asked at this rate, how many years would they
need to pull down all 269? The state had asked for
six months to remove illegal chowkies after a public
interest litigation was filed by activist I K
Chhugani against unauthorised outposts coming up even
on sidewalks, which were being sponsored by builders
and other private business houses.
Chhugani
had filed the PIL last year bringing to the high
courts notice that there were around 300
unauthorised police outposts on Mumbai roads and
pavements. The petition forced the police to assure
the court that within six months all these chowkies
would go.
On
Friday, when the matter came up for further hearing,
Chhugani brought up a fresh issue. He said in 2001,
the then joint commissioner of police, Pralhad
Shinde, proposed to build
redesigned traffic umbrellas at
signals, where policemen can stand. When Chhugani
pointed out that the additional police commissioner
(traffic) had allowed Everest Advertising to put up
advertisement booths across the city, essentially to
benefit the company as the booths are never used by
the police, the bench asked, How much, by way
of fees, do the police get? Chhugani
said, Nothing officially.
The
prosecutor admitted that all these booths would have
to go. The HC then asked the state to file its stay
on these booths within a week.
The
advertising space on booths in prime areas sells for
as much as Rs 2 lakh a month, Chhugani said. Many
such booths are used by vagrants instead, he added.
The
court asked the state to file its stay on these
booths within a week even as it refused to grant a
time period of more than six months for demolishing
unauthorised chowkies. Last month, the police had
promised the court to demolish 137 chowkies within
six months, but public prosecutor Satish Borulkar
pleaded for more time, for making alternative
arrangement. toireporter@timesgroup.com
IN THE LINE OF FIRE: The
court said it would order the razing of all
269 illegal police chowkies within a week if
the police fail to take the demolition order
seriously
(Reproduced
below from the Mumbai Mirror 1st March 2008, pg 4)
How many years
do you need to raze 267 illegal chowkies?
The Bombay High Court raps Mumbai police for
not demolishing illegal chowkies despite the
courts order
DANISH KHAN
The Bombay high court (HC) came down heavily on the
Mumbai police on Friday, for not doing enough against
illegal chowkies. On January 25 this year, the Mumbai
police said that they would demolish the illegal
chowkies spread across the city within six months.
The police had accepted the city has 269 illegal
chowkies in response to a PIL filed by a Khar
resident, Indur Chhugani.
However, the court was stunned
when it was informed that till date only two illegal
chowkies have been demolished.
If only two chowkies have
been demolished in five weeks, how many years will be
needed to demolish the remaining 267 illegal
chowkies? Justices Bilal Nazki and Sharad
Bobade asked.
The public prosecutor later
requested the court to grant six months time from
Friday to get the illegal chowkies demolished.
However, the court said that the period could not be
extended further.
The court also threatened to
order the demolition of chowkies within seven days if
the police do not take the orders seriously.
Chhugani had filed a PIL in the
HC last year pointing out that many chowkies hinder
the movement of people and traffic and also draw
electricity illegally. Most of the chowkies were
sponsored by builders or local shops. Chhugani had
also submitted a copy of the Mumbai Mirror in his PIL
which had a report about chowkies drawing electricity
illegally.
In response to the petition,
the Mumbai police themselves had admitted in an
affidavit on October 24 last year that it has 269
illegal chowkies and would get them
relocated/demolished.